Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
They had $1 million apparently they had collected and knew they owed to a third-party, namely PSA. I can’t imagine there’s any excuse they acted in good faith in losing that money. It wasn’t their money to spend at that point.
|
I agree, on the surface it seems it may have been intentional, we just don't know what else may have been involved, and what assets, if any, are still in the company. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt, and assuming they were trying to run a fairly legit, ongoing company. And thus why I suspected it may have been more of a kiting scheme till things got.better, as opposed to an all out ponzi scheme, where they were in it from day one for a cash grab. I guess we'll find out as more details come out going forward.