View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-26-2017, 10:13 AM
vintagebaseballcardguy's Avatar
vintagebaseballcardguy vintagebaseballcardguy is offline
R0b3rt Ch!ld3rs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordstan View Post
UPI only formed in 1958. I know stamps can be applied later, but absence any other evidence to the contrary, this is not a type 1. It is also not a wire photo. This is a type 2 or 4 depending on if you think it came from an original or copy neg, printed in the middle 60's. I think its a copy neg from what i can see, but i am on phone now, so could be mistaken.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
By no means am I trying to hijack the OP's thread, but I am learning here as well. What do you notice about this photo that hints to you it was produced from a duplicate negative (therefore Type IV)? I tend to agree with your assessment but can't quite put finger on why. Thanks.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote