Sure it's not 100%, but what is an acceptable rate of making errors? If the big authenticators are incorrect 20% of the time, that means for every 10,000they authenticate, 2,000 of them are no good. I have seen way too many circumstances as mentioned where good signatures are failed which essentially makes them worthless and too many bad autographs that are passed as legit. It's an avil that is necessary in today's collecting world and I wish these guys could realize with an extended data base of examples that the item that they are looking at is the real deal.
Regards,
Larry
|