View Single Post
  #7  
Old 08-17-2022, 02:10 PM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is online now
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
Every single one given to a reliever. They simply do not play enough to be the most valuable player in the league, and it has been a complete joke every time it has happened.

Willie Hernandez finishing 1st (Quisenberry was 3rd) in 1984, Fingers in 1981, Eckersley in 1992, etc.

There's no real argument that any of these guys were the best player in their leagues that year.
Agreed. I think the Eckersley's win in '92 was particularly troublesome because not only was he not the best player (I think Kirby Puckett who had a 7.1 WAR was), but he wasn't even close to the best pitcher. Roger Clemens was 18-11 with a 2.41 ERA and a 1.074 WHIP and had a WAR of 8.7 compared to Eckersley's 2.9.
Reply With Quote