View Single Post
  #7  
Old 08-08-2009, 03:47 PM
mikedenero's Avatar
mikedenero mikedenero is offline
Mike DeNero
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhibitman View Post
So you just ignore two cards in the set? That doesn't seem to be right.
Adam,
Point well taken. Here's my answer. The set is called 27 Scrappers (not "21 Cards"); as such, we know they counted something other than cards. Since they are counting scrappers, I think it makes more sense to count unnamed boxers who appear on the cards and ignore cards which simply picture an arm. How does it make sense to count an arm/fist as a scrapper rather than an unnamed fighter pictured "scrapping" with a named fighter? A scrapper without a name is a scrapper nonetheless!

Also, since the checklist back has been a riddle for a century, perhaps Phila Caramel made the nebulous checklist to confuse kids who collected all 21 cards, thus forcing them to buy more caramels in search of the "eight other" scrappers, who a kid would assume to be real boxers not named on the checklist????
__________________
www.MDsportscards.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote