View Single Post
  #3  
Old 10-18-2009, 09:36 AM
Matt E. Matt E. is offline
Matt E.
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 201
Default

I agree with you Frank that what SGC says pretty much goes as the standard, but I am not so willing to agree with our beloved SGC right now. Maybe I will change my mind.

Regarding this new Mathewson Cycle "variation"... Currently the card is found with only one back. It should not be added to the Master Set until a "37-1" example surfaces on a different advertising back........ OR with the correct stats listed on the Cycle back to set a baseline comparison.


Would love to hear thoughts from SGC or Joshua on this one please.

Can someone post a scan of the back of this card?

Last edited by Matt E.; 10-18-2009 at 10:02 AM.
Reply With Quote