View Single Post
  #21  
Old 03-07-2007, 11:25 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Further Thoughts about Red Cobb with Cobb back

Posted By: JimB

Barry said,
"I think the Cobb back is not consistent with the way T206 was distributed."

It came with tobacco. It was a promotional piece for selling tobacco. What more do you want?

I have said this before, but I will repeat it here: T206 was a rather arbitrary designation for a number of different baseball picture cards inserted as a promotional piece with American Tobacco Company products between 1909-1911. If Ty Cobb brand was part of the ATC and they were produced during those years, then by definition, according to the ATC, it is a T206. Unless we are questioning the entire way ATC categorized cards and we are going to consider Piedmont , Sweet Cap, etc. unique sets (which is a legitimate claim), then I don't see why Ty Cobb brand should be signaled out. It you want to distinguish it because of the gloss on the front, then maybe T206-1.

I would want to see proof that it was produced by Coupon before calling it T213.

What if Sweet Cap 350's had the same gloss? Would we categorize them as T213s?

Reply With Quote