Quote:
Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby
In my opinion, the way PSA has continued to handled this debacle has significantly hurt their credibility as a company who provides a quality service.
Also consider this. In my opinion the '73 Shell looks like an 8, so the latest buyer overpaid by about $3100. But there's also another victim. The 1973 Topps Art Shell PSA 10 is now a pop 2. The other PSA 10 card has, at least theoretically, now been significantly devalued since the supply has now artificially doubled.
By the way, whether many people know this or not, many deleted CU Board threads do get saved by Google's webcache feature.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us |
Dan, he didn't overpay. He got exactly what he wanted -- a PSA 10 to add to his registry set. If he cared about the condition of the actual card, he could have returned it, or sent it to PSA to review. Instead, he added it happily to his registry set. We always say, buy the card, not the label, but there are folks to whom the label is just as -- or more -- important.