11-21-2022, 08:41 AM
|
 |
Ben North
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,859
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by packs
Did you consider I might have thought of all those things and that's why I said pitching got worse as Gwynn's career went on? From 1992 to 1997 the NL average ERA went from 3.50 to 4.20, that is a significant rise and I'm not sure how you can say it doesn't indicate a decline in pitching. You said pitching was diluted, same thing. If the average pitcher is worse and there are more bad pitchers than good pitchers, why wouldn't it stand to reason that an elite hitter would have a higher batting average against weaker competition?
I don't see where the controversy lies with Gwynn.
|
Seriously still on ERA. 
Here you go.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/NL/bat.shtml
|