So to summarize, the seller received this ball 4+ years ago from the original owner and sent it to Keating for authentication. The LOA is authentic although there is nothing concretely linking ball and LOA. I assume Kevin has some sort of record of this, and all that is left is the issue of whether his opinion is correct?
I must say this is a very interesting thread, and would love to see Kevin come on and address this version of events. Scott's initial assertion of mismatched LOA/ball should easily be cleared up. Which just leaves the debate on authenticity.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet
|