I appreciate your reply, I fed my original post and also your response into chatgpt and the following was the result;
I understand your concerns about the limitations and potential drawbacks of using AI tools like ChatGPT. It is true that the model is trained on a large dataset of text from the internet, and the accuracy and relevance of the information it generates can vary. Additionally, the model is still in a testing phase and there may be bugs or limitations in its performance. However, it is important to note that the model is not intended to replace human knowledge or expertise, but rather to assist in tasks such as language generation and understanding. As a language model, ChatGPT is not able to access your computer and it is not a tax software, so the scenarios you described do not apply to it.
It is also true that AI-generated content can be used for academic dishonesty, that's why it is important to use it responsibly and ethically. The model is not a replacement for learning and understanding a subject, but rather a tool that can assist in tasks such as language generation, language understanding, and other related tasks.
It is also important to note that AI and Machine Learning is still an evolving field and the capabilities are rapidly changing. It is important to stay informed about the latest developments and use the technology responsibly and ethically.
#notai im back, I read somewhere yesterday that the associated press (ap) has been generating articles for 18 months and passing them off as a journalist written pieces....no one knew the difference, think about that.
|