Quote:
Originally Posted by slidekellyslide
He's a snake, why should we believe him? Maybe if he did the honorable thing and came clean, made restitution, et cetera, but as long as he's running from that it's just an agenda and not to be taken seriously.
|
Truth is truth, Dan. The moral character of the source notwithstanding.
If we ignore the Lifson references, is what Nash has been saying true?
Yes. It has.
Has an ungodly amount of material--much of which has been appearing on the market--been stolen from the HoF Library and the NYPL? Yes.
Has much of the high-end Halper material purchased by MLB and donated to the HoF been shown to be counterfeit? Yes.
Have many of the stories put forth by Halper regarding the provenance of items in his collection--including different, contradictory stories about the same piece--shown to be blatant lies? Yes.
Has the HoF made little-to-no effort in reacquiring its stolen material? Yes.
Has PSA and JSA made mind-numbing "blunders," without once owning up to their errors? Yes.
And so on.