Thread: Fraudosynthesis
View Single Post
  #38  
Old 07-07-2022, 12:07 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorditadogg View Post
By my own standards, I weight color, focus and centering (which are easier to see from a picture than the technical irregularities the TPG's evaluate) much more than wrinkles and other surface irregularities. So I guess I am happy they spend their time on those things, so their grade gives me a good baseline before I look at it.
It's true that color and focus issues should be more obvious when looking to buy even at scans online - but if grading is supposed to at least loosely correlate with eye appeal, to me it is deceptive when certain factory issues are judged harshly by graders, and others are largely overlooked. Fading I guess is different.

Agreed I can pick most of those things out by myself, but it goes to the continued necessity of the adage "Technical grading is not eye appeal" being used as a disclaimer.

That's a super nice '66 Mantle!
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers.

Last edited by jchcollins; 07-07-2022 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote