View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-08-2023, 06:24 AM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,699
Default

In the 80's, the quality of most baseball art was horrid. At the time, Perez' art seemed palatable because there simply weren't appealing alternatives. Fast forward to today, and I can't even look at his work. It's awful! So much in the way of blotchy skin tones and the faces often look like the work of a questionably talented young teenager at best. Did all white players suffer from rosacea?

Artists like Graig blew Perez out of the water.

My statements are only opinions. They're neither correct nor incorrect. It's art (or "art", depending on your position). Subjective.

Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 01-08-2023 at 06:31 AM.
Reply With Quote