I’ve always been one for lumping the T206s with T213-1 and T215-1 but I understand the deference to Burdick’s system. The one thing that is curious to me is why he created subsets for the E92 groups and acknowledged the sequential nature of the Coupon, Red Cross and Obak sets but didn’t break down T206 into -1, -2, -3, etc based on the different series. That’s always seemed to be internally inconsistent. An interesting ‘what if’ is how he would’ve reacted to T206 if, say, the captions on the 460 series cards were printed in blue ink. Would they have still been T206’s?
|