Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R
Hey Ted,
I was posting to show how the Brown Lenox stands out when compared to the Black Lenox and the Cairo Monopol it had nothing to do with your
theory.
As a matter of fact your group theory mirrors what I posted 5 years ago with the exception of Ames who is to use Scot Readers phrase is a rule breaker.
I posted this thread 5 years ago
https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...ighlight=Lenox
It didn't receive a response but I brought it up again in one of your threads
Attachment 413518
Your response was it was worth tracking and coincidentally
a few months later you started your Brown Lenox theory
that with the exception of Ames mirrored what I posted. |
Pat
Do we have to "re-hash" all this stuff all over again ?
First of all, I presented my "Mutually-Exclusive" theory (Group A and Group B) regarding the 350/460 series back in 2009. And, at that time I noted that Ames (hands over head)
was in the
Group B. Ames did not fit the pattern; therefore, I had serious doubts about it. I did some "detective" work and tracked down the Net54 member, who posted that the
Ames was "confirmed" with an AMERICAN BEAUTY 46O back (which was posted in Bill Brown's Super Set back in 2006). This fellow stated that his post in the Super Set regarding
Ames was a mistake.
So, I
REMOVED Ames from my
Group B list, and transferred him into the
Group A list.
What does it take to convince you that this
AMES does not exist with an
AMERICAN BEAUTY 46O back or a
UZIT back (as T206resource incorrectly claims) ?
We have "hashed" this over and over again in the past.....and, I'm tired of dealing with your repeated "crap" on this matter !
How's about, I offer you these FIVE CRISP $100 BILLS if you can find an AUTHENTIC Ames (hands over head ) card with an
AMERICAN BEAUTY 46O back, or a
UZIT back.
Furthermore, this offer goes to anyone else here on this forum.
TED Z
T206 Reference
.