View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-03-2012, 05:56 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Borders View Post
FWIW, I checked PSA pop report for EPDGs (883 total graded for 260 subjects = an average of 3.4 EPDGs per subject)

The # graded for the following selected subjects are:

Dahlen (Bos): 2
Ewing: 2
Ganley: 1
T. Jones: 2
Karger: 3
Lindaman: 7
Mullin (Horiz): 4
Lundgren (Chi): 8


Best Regards and Happy Collecting,
Craig
Thanks Craig. Perhaps it's not a popular card to get slabbed by PSA, but I sold one a couple of months ago and saw two more in other auctions. Three in 2-3 months.

I'm still curious how PSA and SGC pop reports relate to actual physical numbers of cards in existence. I have asked this question numerous times here, but have gotten no responses. Scot Reader posted that he came up with his "T206 hardest cards" list based, in part, on PSA pop reports, but I haven't gotten a response to my question as to how he actually used them to come up with numbers. If you really believe PSA pop reports, then (again, not to bore anyone, but I'm repeating myself for about the fourth time this year), then you have to believe that many of the tough variations are no tougher than their counterparts.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote