Quote:
Originally Posted by Donavon
It will be another two weeks before I return home, but I may have some pictures of the Williams' autos from my old home. I will check & post them if so. That said......to imply that I stayed away from the board because I was "hiding" is simply wreckless. My time is needed in other areas as well, such as work, home, etc... Some of us do have lives outside of collecting. Unfortunately, I had to appease the government when I was supposed to be at home. To me, it sounds alot like the owner of the Hauls of Shame website giving out opinions on things that they have never themselves actually examined. "It's a fake. It's a laser copy, although I've never actually examined it." Travis, I know you have this vendetta against PSA, as clearly signaled by your exerpt from the aforementioned website. They do make mistakes, just as we humans often do. But they also get it right most of the time, regardless of what "Mr. Pop Goes The Weasel" has to say. By the way...... is anyone else here aware of that guy's legal troubles? He's being sued by just about everyone in the hobby, including a certain auction house CEO (that I would go to bat for any day) for over $800,000. And my integrity is questioned? What a load of b.s.!
|
I was railing against psa LONG, LONG, LONG before I ever heard the name Peter Nash, ok? Let's make this bad Cobb autograph about him, that somehow makes the autograph real, doesn't it? It's about the autograph, and the track record of PSA is what it is. I ask some people if PSA could have possibly certed a reprint, and they say no way, but the real PSA I can't put anything past just because we know what they have done in the past, it's scary.
but for some of us, this autograph is not up in the air, it's a settled issue already. But it's okay, I am willing to put all aside and wait for the verdict, I just want to see what PSA does, because they only have two options, real or fake.
They can say it's real, which is the funnest option. They can say it's fake, which they won't do in public and apologize, they would only do it privately with an agreement most liekly, that's why the odds are we won't hear it, it will just be silence. That's why we really want to hear the verdict, because silence= you know what.
All in all, no one here, richard and myself, are critical of you personally, but when you didn't show for two weeks after you said you would, we had reason to think we wouldn't hear from you again. And we want to hear from you again.
We might be critical of PSA, but they can prove us wrong and stick to their original "authentic" decision.
We have nothing against you, we just want to know the verdict. I am sure you do too.