Quote:
Originally Posted by Donavon
Travis,
There are also other print dots on the Keurajian example that are not on mine, most notably below the line under Cobb's name. Thank you for that high resolution scan of the Keurajian example. It was very useful in comparing with the high resolution scan of mine. Again....I will let PSA/DNA examine the piece again. They are fully aware of all the information & questions on both pieces that we are. When that is done, I will have another 3rd party document expert examine it as well. I will reserve my judgement until such is done by those experts. And yes, I consider them experts though they are human & subject to human error. Considering that PSA is a very well known company & this has become a public incident I doubt very seriously they would deem it genuine twice if it is in fact not.
|
thats cool, you should send it to them, let's see what they say.
no one has seen a high res scan of yours, its fuzzy, the holder is in the way. if you have a good crisp scan of yours, could you post it?
but c'mon, there is no way that the dots i circled could possibly be in the same spots on both by mere coincidence.
I know you want it to be a different signature, but its just not, its the same one. You have to look at the facts.
PSA doesn't have a boxing expert listed, and they asked me to be their boxing autograph consultant a couple of years ago, I ultimately chose not to, but it's not like I am out in left field here with no qualifications. I still have never seen two signature that are undistinguishable by the unaided human eye match so close like this one that are two different signatures, that is why i would love to see the two similar williams sigs you say you own. No one signs their name exactly the same way twice. And these two are exact.
Just please promise you will post the results, good , bad or otherwise on what psa says. i dont have any money riding on it, so i am not wishing it one way or the other, but i just really want to know what they say.