I read this first in Nash's site.
The first and easy thing to do is attack Nash who did a great job uncovering this. Why attack him? He's acting like a journalist. Sounds like all the political ads on my television.
Second, so let me get this straight. The item was "in preview" and therefore you assumed it would pass JSA or PSA/DNA, but doesn't Heritage employee authenticators themselves like Mike?
Lastly, I guess Nash should wait until the auction runs before pointing out errors, huh?
Regards,
Larry
|