View Single Post
  #7  
Old 03-13-2012, 06:33 PM
novakjr novakjr is offline
David Nova.kovich Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 20 miles east of the Mistake
Posts: 2,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brett 75 View Post
Not confused on the high number issue , if there is less supply then that would make sense. What I was trying to find out is are the higher numbers really that much harder to find than the lower numbers making there value that much different ? And why are the not listed as 1962 if they came out that year ? This forum is always a great way to get more information and I always appreciate the great responses . If you don't ask ... Thanks Brett
Sorry Brett. I was a little thrown off by your trying to explain that they weren't technically high numbers. It led me to believe that you were more focused on the "high number" thing, rather than why "high numbers" generally carry a premium. If I offended, I apologize.
Reply With Quote