Originally Posted by ls7plus
First of all, read my posts. I have never taken a postion with regard to this card's authencity. What I have said is the following:
(1) I would like more information with regard to the actual printing characteristics of the card;
(2) That the more actual information one has, the better one's decisions tend to be;
(3) That there have been occasions during my multiple decade involvement with this hobby, probably too numerous to count, where many people have felt they could positively authenticate a card or not, concerning its allegedly original, unaltered condition, based on the appearance of the card to the naked eye, and that they, including myself on several unfortunate occasions, have been wrong (this card hardly stands alone in this regard); and
(4) magnification has been of invaluable assistance to both dealers and collectors alike, as well, I would hope, to graders, in this regard, when it is coupled with a little knowledge.
Now, these truths should be self-evident, rather than a stimulus for vitriol and venom, and I wasn't the one who initiated any posts that were meant or intended to be insulting in the course of this discussion. I'm well aware of the history of this card, and have even read Michael O'Keeffe's discussion of it in his book, "The Card" (highly recommended reading on this as well as other subjects, by the way). To the above 4 points, I would add a 5th:
(5) What did this "newbie" grading service actually do in the way of examining the card to reach the conclusion they did?
I've always wanted to have as much information regarding this cherished hobby as I could lay my hands on, and this occasion is simply no different!
Best regards to all those other dedicated collectors out there, who know we hold the very history of the game itself in our hands as guardians/custodians for future generations,
Larry
|