ugly...
Scott............Hey, I love collecting the vintage signed cards and I've thought about getting his autograph on an early career card like 52T or 51B before, as well.....but I always come back to the same few feelings. First, his signing prices are absurd. Second, 95% of people that have gotten his signature in person have had negative experiences due to his personality (i.e.....he's supposedly a huge jerk). And third, his autograph is UGLY!!! And it's gotten worse. If there was a way for him to sign his name like he did in the 50's, I would definitely pay for that style of signature on one of those two cards, but otherwise I'd pass and look for a card already signed with the older signature. That's just my opinion.....oh, and back to the original question....I guess I'd get him to inscribe 'N.Y. Giants'.
Sorry for the rambling,
Matt
|