View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-08-2011, 05:31 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abravefan11 View Post
I don't believe these were damage to stones or print anomalies. They were intentional and the quoted theory above is the one I believe to be the most plausible explanation.
Sorry, I should have quoted. It came across as unclear.

The 30s are intentional and probably part of the plate/stone rather than stamped.

The mark over the T on the piedmont card is probably damage.

Steve B
Reply With Quote