Original vs Alterations/restorations--where are we headed?
Hmmm...interesting. A restored/altered card with good eye appeal seeking to soar in value above scarred and time tested originals with honest wear. Apart from the entrapreneurial force at work, the situation presents a significant philosophical question. One that comes home to roost in one instance, as I have a 1935 Diamond Stars Foxx that I originally bought as a raw NrMt many years ago for $400, only to have several grading companies deem it trimmed. Still had PSA slab it the last time, with the label reading, "Authentic; Trimmed." Quite frankly, I prefer this card in my collection due to its outstanding eye appeal (no creases, well-centered, little to no apparent wear) to a well-worn and/or well-creased example, and have no intention of seeking a replacement for the card soon, even with Foxx being one of my favorites. On the other hand, I did not keep it for the purpose of latter attempting to sell it for profit.
If this is what you were getting at, Brian, does anyone else have any thoughts about what it says regarding what direction the hobby is headed, and the ramifications of taking that path?
Intriguing post.
Larry
Last edited by ls7plus; 07-09-2011 at 07:01 AM.
|