Update: Slightly disappointed, but all in all - I think it's fair.
GOOD 2 MK 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT FRANK CHANCE PORTRAIT-RED
***Must just be ignorant to some of PSA's grading style... There is a pencil mark on the front of the card, near the right side of the face, but there is nothing else wrong with the card. It was originally BVG 3. I thought it would be 5 MK. Is it a 2 because the MK was on the front?
EXCELLENT 5 MK 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL ED REULBACH GLOVE SHOWING
***Accurate
VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 MK 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT FRANK CHANCE BATTING
***Accurate, though I thought it should have came back as a 5 MK.
VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL HARRY STEINFELDT WITH BAT
***I guess I was incorrect about their process. They must have marked off for it being OC, and not MC. Is this what they do? They don't give a qualifier to OC, only MC?
It's at least a 6 with regard to corners and cleanliness of the card.
VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1909-1911 T206 PIEDMONT ED REULBACH GLOVE SHOWING
***This was an SGC 30, so I'm happy with this...***
EXCELLENT 5 MK 1909-1911 T206 SWEET CAPORAL GEORGE BROWN BROWNE, CHICAGO
***Accurate.
__________________
.
Looking for: T205 Cubs in AB, Cycle, Sov, HLC. & E91A Cubs, T206 Cubs master set, T3 Cubs
|