Quote:
Originally Posted by chaddurbin
it's funny in these t206/ted threads you can always count on one thing...ted being dismissive of anyone with a different view than his and he stops engaging them. maybe if he was more open-minded he could learn a couple new things instead of throwing out wild guesses and theories and presenting them as facts (and when being shown wrong he ignores them...rinse repeat).
i agree with tim/frank/rhett/jim side  |
I just got in and read this. I don't understand what your problem is ? I cannot respond to someone's comments directed at me if I'm not at home.
And, of course I know that the 20 Southern Leaguers in the T213-1 set are 150/350 series subjects. This set also comprises of 42 Major Leaguers that are strictly
from the 350-only series of the T206 set. And, an additional six Major Leaguers that Scot Reader has identified as the 6 "super-prints". These 6 subjects were init-
ially from the 350-only series. Then American Litho. extended these 6 subjects into the 460-only series.
Apparently, you haven't been reading any of my threads on the 1910 COUPON (T213-1) set. Here are some links you can click onto and read my previous posts on
this subject.....then perhaps you can apologize.
2010
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ht=1910+coupon
2008
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ht=1910+coupon
2008
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ghlight=t213-1
I just happen to think that the T213-1 cards are are part of the T206 set (and there are quite a few people here who do agree with this premise).
You apparently don't, and that's fine, too. But, do you have to resort to your diatribe against me (in post #88) ?
I have never, ever said anything to demean you (or otherwise) at any time that I have posted on this forum. So, where the heck are you coming from ? ?
TED Z