Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosox Blair
Guys, we need to avoid putting misinformation out there.
This is not simply an old flip. Not at all.
In every era of the PSA holder, T206 has been identified as T206. With no date whatsoever on the flip. If I'm wrong, show me (but I'm not).
|
First off, I'd like to mention that the Piedmont printing over the back
damage on this card is cause for concern, and I'm not overlooking this
oddity.
Secondly, I don't know why we can't have a simple discussion/debate over
facets of our hobby without getting frustrated and making the claim that
"we're never going to post in this thread." I mean, this is a board
for discussions and we're all adults. Nobody here is questioning anyone's
knowledge or expertise, just offering opinions.
Lastly, I'd like to offer another example of a PSA flip with this same
clerical error. I cannot attest to the validity of this card or slab, but
at least we have another example of both the "1911" and the "#".
Found at:
http://www.nowbatting19.com/aboutuspage.html
