Thread: T206 Traders
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11-26-2010, 08:41 AM
dougscats dougscats is offline
Doug Doremus
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Breezy Point, NY
Posts: 1,443
Default Did I offer you this already?

Hi again, S,

I'd think this Leifield is VG at least [please tell me what you'd grade it; I'd defer to your expertise]. I decided that I liked my trimmed Leifield enough that I'd keep it and trade my number 1. I need your Phillippe and Dougherty.
Forgive me if I offered you this already; I thought I had, but I may have made a mistake.
I also have an SGC graded 30/2/Good Ganzel that you may not have seen, and I'm also including scans of Barger, Pastorius, and Strang, which I'd say are in the Good range, in case you're interested

Hope to hear from you.

Doug


Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunsteig View Post
Think this is a fine idea to set up a list for trading T206s. I have a few duplicates that I'd be looking to trade:
  • Powell as PSA 4 and PSA 5.5 -- can trade either one for a similarly graded (PSA) of a different horizontal card
  • Dougherty (arm in air) - polar bear back, ungraded, will aim to post scan later today, probably GD-VG condition
  • Phillippe - Piedmont back, ungraded, roughly GD-VG condition

Also have several SGC-graded cards for which I'd like to switch over to PSA, simply for consistency with the rest of the graded part of my collection which is mostly PSA (although I do think the SGC grades make for nicer cards). Can trade these for similar condition PSA cards, of identical players or similar commons:
  • Kleinow (Boston), polar bear back, SGC 60
  • Maloney, SC 350 back, SGC 60
  • Owen, SC 150, SGC 60

Let me know if you'd like scans/photos.

Thanks,
--S
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 11-24-2010 9;47;16 AM.jpg (66.6 KB, 188 views)
File Type: jpg 11-24-2010 9;47;20 AM.jpg (64.9 KB, 190 views)
File Type: jpg 11-22-2010 8;37;24 PM.jpg (73.6 KB, 188 views)
File Type: jpg 11-22-2010 8;37;29 PM.jpg (75.3 KB, 189 views)
File Type: jpg 10-19-2010 11;03;43 AM.jpg (72.0 KB, 191 views)
Reply With Quote