Thread: How Ridiculous
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 07-03-2010, 04:10 PM
Matthew H Matthew H is offline
Matt Hall
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrysloate View Post
It makes even less sense because the best 1914 Cracker Jack set is light years ahead of either of these, so why bother?
I agree, PSA has no business handing out a "Best Vintage Pre-War Baseball Set of the year award" to a 1914 CJ set. That would be SGC's award to give.

OT- Here's my chance to address QC and a customer service issue that I have with PSA. I just received my last submission that I sent to them with Express service. The card came back with a deep scratch in the case straight through the face of the player on the front. How could that pass QC?

I called customer service and they offered me a free re holder service that takes 2 weeks. I paid 35$ to get this card back in a week, now I have to send it back which will cost me close to 20$ for shipping and insurance. I also have to wait 2 weeks for them to spend 2 minutes reholdering a card.

Frustrating.
Reply With Quote