View Single Post
  #13  
Old 07-01-2010, 01:14 PM
Abravefan11's Avatar
Abravefan11 Abravefan11 is offline
Tim
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,466
Default

Thanks everyone for the kind words, I genuinely appreciate them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan View Post
Tim

Great research....but I'm somewhat confused, if your contention is that all the T206 Southern Leaguer's (SL)
were issued the same time, then please explain why only 34 of the SL were printed with the HINDU back in
the 150 Series ?

TED Z
I believe there is a lot of evidence that the fourteen 350 Only series players were selected at the same time as the other 34 to be in the set. Why they were not printed in the first run of Hindu backs remains a mystery but I don't feel their omission from the Hindu set proves in anyway that they were selected at a different time from the other 34.

Ted - Regarding your second post, I don't disagree with anything you say however it's not relevant to Joe's inclusion in the Southern League group. If ATC decided to select the 48 and did so as I propose between January and April of 1909, then Joe wasn't a member of any of those teams at that time. One could make an argument for him being in the set as a Philadelphia A, but not a Southern League representative.
__________________
T206 & Boston National Type Card Collector
T206Resource.com

Last edited by Abravefan11; 07-01-2010 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote