Todd, at least now you actually post something relative to the thread.
If it was your disgust with my method of bringing this up perhaps you could have posted your thoughts the first time (or offline me LOL) vs. #85 posts in you deciding to act like the boards floor manager regurgitating my own post stating I shouldn’t post on any more on this and making your snide comment.
Speaking of snide comments I think that is what this whole thread started about SGC making snide comments to Hank and Scott calling them out. Scott then proceeded to state some facts of which he conveniently left out some major details. Did I bring them up sure did could I have brought them up offline yes, just as Scott could have handled this offline with SGC.
Sorry I stand by my confusion on this whole thing and am very disappointed in what appears to be simply the Levy’s passing off a questionable card behind a slip. Especially when these guys of all folks should know the sting of a bogus card in a holder, and have all the knowledge to avoid any doubt on a card such as this.
If my outline of events and details is wrong I welcome the correction and will admit and apologize if I’m wrong.
Also if I’m the only person on here who is confused by the whole list of details provided, and I’m the only one left scratching their head over why collectors as advanced as the Levy’s would represent this card as they did. Then I stand alone and I’m ok with that.
It’s board where we can post on topics and post opinions, Scott had no problem brining up the subject on a public forum and listing his side hoping for support or a rally against SGC. Why should I not list my thoughts or details in the same public manner? If you think I’m doing Scott & Hank dirty that’s cool I respect your views. However I'm on topic, I welcome discussion, I presented details and welcomed correction from Scott and I’ve not been vulgar or disruptive in any way nor am I anonymous.
I will add for the record I’ve also done right by Hank & Scott too for the record so I think this is bit deeper than me taking cheap shots at them for kicks.
Cheers,
John
|