Fair enough
We will agree to reasonably disagree reasonably.
Here is a quote I found from an earlier thread (which I began) re: the Cobb back not being a T206:
"...Put another way, "T206" have a list of backs included; it does not enumerate a set of criteria for being a T206 for us to then catagorize cards. Even if the smoking gun (an advertisement or legal document) conclusively puts Cobb at a later date or different distribution vehicle, it is a T206 because a "T206" is a "T206"..."
You know who authored this?...Me. After posting my theory and getting the same kind of beating, I came to this conclusion on Cobb and still do. However, this does not mean educated discourse should be abandoned. As for me, 1910 Coupons are welcome in my "T206" stack. Thank you.
|