It is amazing how this subject keeps popping up. There is a lot more to it than "Burdick said so"- Frank, Tim, and Frank gave great examples of why it is classified the way it is. To me, it goes with it's series.T213-1, T213-2,and last but not least,T213-3.
Yes, there are similarities with T206. So what? T202's have similarities with T205's. Should those be re-classified? Should T210's be called T206's because they share some T206 images and have an almost identical Old Mill back (except for the series# at the top)? I'm semi-kidding (
).........but really, it's just a classification system, and it's not "wrong", so why try to fix it if it's not broken?
Clayton