Quote:
Originally Posted by pgellis
And you think "best interest" involves overturning a routine judgement call/play?
|
I think having 3 of the 21 perfect games in history occur within a month is far from routine.
I think last night's game, and the play that should have ended it, were routine, only until the incorrect call was made. At that point, they ceased being routine.
I am all for getting things correct, and if that means correcting correctable errors, I am generally for it. If things had unfolded differently last night I might have felt differently. If the following batters had gotten hits and/or scored runs, I may have felt differently. But they didn't. That makes this the easiest of errors to correct. Batter is out. Game is over. Next guys AB doesn't count. Perfect game goes in the book. Apologize to the kid for ruining his celebration.
However, I feel that both sides of this argument have valid points. What isn't valid is saying that the Commissioner doesn't have the power to change it. He does. Whether he should or not is what's debatable.