This is how I see it. The photo contains visual evidence of the player being Shoeless Joe Jackson. If no one can show the same, if not better, evidence that it's another player, then isn't it now Jackson until someone can DISPROVE that it is. If the player has been a "mystery" since 1912, then the mystery is now solved. If it's not Joe Jackson, then who is it and what is the evidence showing that it is said player. More evidence points to it being Jackson than any other player, so even if it's questionable, it's now up to someone to prove that it's NOT him.
|