Quote:
Originally Posted by brett
Yeah you're right, in the picture below from the same year Joe doesn't have any lines running from his nose to his chin and he looks EXTREMELY young for his age (and of course the ears don't match up either). Neither does the hair, chin or anything else. Nah, that's not Joe Jackson.  |
you can be a smartass about it if you want, but your image comparison doesn't prove anything Brett. I still say the player sliding is much older than Jackson" looked" at that time. How you base your judgement on just partial bits of evidence is amazingly peculiar for someone who doesn't really care if it's Joe Jackson or not. If this was a court case you'd have lost by now. Your expert's opinion is just that ...an opinion from a self described Joe Jackson expert who knows nothing about facial recognition or photo idenitification. based on the same photos we've all been looking at. How closely has he examined other photos of players on the team that looked simialr in uniform to one another ? He hasn't most likely
this card. the sad thing is, whether you like it or not you've now convinced a certain amount of people that it is Jackson on the card, and who knows where this will go after that.
It's not Joe Jackson just because Mike Nola and you think it is...sorry. It's going to take some definitive evidence which you may never find in order to be able to make that statement to anyone but your collecting buddies.