Quote:
Originally Posted by Abravefan11
Brett remember that I don't need to have any evidence to say that it's not Joe and you need something factual to say that it is. Right now even with all the things that point to it possibly being Joe you don't have anything definitive to say that it is. With that said I encourage you and everyone else to keep looking.
|
Exactly. It would be great if this turns out to be Jackson, but absent a corroborating photo from a newspaper or archive you just can't say with any certainty that it is Jackson.
Despite the minor blow ups this thread really is a great one and despite what others might say this really is good for the hobby to have these types of discussions.