The two cards were accurately graded per SGC's standards. I agree with you that eye-appeal should be a greater factor. Just my opinion. If grading does not reflect the desirability of a card's physical characteristics to a large degree, I think it is missing the point. That said, bidders certainly did and there was quite a price disparity between the two. But it was not a mistake by PSA. THey were graded back-to-back on the same submission.
JimB
|