View Single Post
  #18  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:04 AM
mr2686 mr2686 is offline
Mike Rich@rds0n
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ca
Posts: 3,197
Default

Tom,

I originally saw that 1908 was the first year as well, but have since confirmed from multiple sources that 1909 was actually the first...the confusion may have been because the 1909 has 1908 info? Not sure. Looking forward to seeing your photos.
Thanks again,
Mike
Reply With Quote