We are all intitled to our opinions and I am about 90% sure if this happened to not be an actuall board member then not much but a discussion about wether or not previously graded cards should be disclosed as them and what you opinions are about that.

Now that the guy happens to be a board member things change like I am making a huge issue. Like I stated above I am sure no crime has been commited but I do believe the listing is misleading especially since the card was graded and described as an error of some type. This is just my opinion. Some share it some don't.

Maybe I should have reworded for some of you guys to say that I believe the listing is a bit misleading instead of dishonest Same thing but maybe in the politically correct way of thinking it is 2 different things.