View Single Post
  #17  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:14 PM
marvjung's Avatar
marvjung marvjung is offline
Marvin J.
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 92
Default

I find it admirable that SGC assumed the responsibility of a problem when, really looking at the OP and reading behind it, I feel this is truly a PSA problem.

I also find it admirable that SGC felt obligated to "correcting" a problem that wasn't really theirs to begin with; in all honesty, PSA should have corrected this.

Regardless of the fact that the card was out of their holder, they were the originating graders on this. I understand that the added color was not noticed till AFTER the card was cracked out of the original PSA holder - which I could completely understand, but PSA should be the ones taking up with the slack, in addition to the auction house. How can one tout a PSA pre-war card rated at an outstanding grade of 7, only to have it comeback an A and not take some form of responsibility is..."detrimental."

Kudos to SGC for dealing to resolving a problem.
__________________
Trying to complete a T213 set!!
Reply With Quote