Jim VB
I...."didn't start this fire"....Billy Joel, 1989
You make me laugh.....your cohort (Rob D) started this back in July 2008, when I posted an informative thread of Jack Dunn
discovering Babe Ruth. It was a very interesting discussion until your buddy Rob interjected with his totally OFF-TOPIC posts.
Thread's link......
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ight=jack+dunn
Since then, Rob and/or you will interject the "T206 Dunn" into totally unrelated threads of mine in order to distract from the
subject of that thread. This has been a recurring tactic of Rob's; and, it has become quite stale. A wise-a$$ remark may be
initially entertaining....but, when it is repeated as often as this Dunn "gimmick" has been, that is the sign of a diabolical mind.
But, I guess I should be "honored" to be the target of you guys. I join the ranks of Frank Wakefield, Potomac Joe, etc., etc.
Where do you guys draw the line ? ?
Both you & Matt are leaping to unwarranted assumptions. I did not address Matt in my post (#45). You are guilty of raising
a big "stink" here, over your imagined criticism by me. As I said, Matt was not the only one shooting flak at me on this topic.
Your quote of my comments....
"The tone of your responses ("If you were better informed...", "Your entire approach to this subject is blurred by your narrow
minded zeal..."
Why did you leave out my key words that followed...."to strictly statistically analyze everything." That's the crux of the mat-
ter with Matt. He tries to super-analyze this situation and when I provide him supporting data for my argument he goes off on
another tangent. And, mind you this continued via emails. Believe me, one cannot appreciate the various aspects of the T206
series subtleties by simply analyzing them statistically. I think you'll agree with this, that many years of experience collecting
T206's are needed to fully understand the Monster.
I'll end this by repeating to you (and Rob) your own final words with my modifications......
"don't attack"....DISTRACT...."those whoSE THREADS attempt to have (that) MEANINGFUL discussion"......
WITH YOUR WISE-A$$ TACTICS THAT TEND TO DIGRESS THE INTENT OF THE ONE'S DISCUSSION ON THIS FORUM.
Regards,
TED Z