Quote:
Originally Posted by bobfreedman
I think we all know what I was implying, Jeff has accused someone of wrongdoing without a shred of evidence, only conjecture and hypothesis. I understand that our legal system is the best in the world (I have lived outside the US many years) but I am entitled to my opinion (another great thing about living in this country) and in my opinion Jeff is handling this poorly by damaging the reputation of an honest person. And this I speak from fact.
|
All Jeff has done is that he has seen some dramatic abnormalities in the sales prices of items from this particular auction house, and pointed them out.
A couple of years ago, he pointed out some similar irregularities with another auction house and was harshly criticized for his take. How'd that work out?
Sure you're entitled to your opinion, but this is a Vintage Baseball Card Forum, which makes Jeff's thoughts on an auction's potential irregularities completely "on topic".
Conversely, your post on Jeff's chosen profession is totally "off topic".
I don't care if he picks up trash for the city. If he sees things being done wrongly I want to hear and read about it.
If you disagree with his opinion, go ahead. Say why. But leave the straw man arguments out of the discussion.
Edited to add: I'm not sure I'd use the term "without a shred of evidence." He offered plenty of evidence. Most of it was circumstantial, but it's still evidence.
Edited again: You said, "And this I speak from fact." Care to offer any of those facts?