T206 by defintion
In my opinion, a true T206 "set" should have an example of each different player/pose, thus a "complete" set should include a Wagner and a Plank, but would not have to have either the Magie error or Doyle corrected error, as they are the same pose(and teams although Doyle was mismatched. However one could argue that Elberfeld, Smith, etc which have the same pose but team changes listed would not need be included in the "set" either. Those would fall under the scope of a "master" set which would include every variation.
Whatever the case of the "variations" I just don't think you can call a T206 set "complete" without a Wagner or Plank, regardless of vlaue.
Scott
|