Posted By:
Todd Schultz1. 1952 --important historically, classic looking
2. 1956 --probably the best looking, along w/'55s
3. 1955 --would be as nice or better than '56s but for player selection
4. 1957 --photography, while not always consistent, makes this one, along with great stadium backdrops
5. 1953 --neat artwork, probably appreciated more later after kids got spoiled on real photography from '52
6. 1954 --great promise but player selection sorely lacked--they're lucky they hit on those three rookies
7. 1951 --too small in card and set size, like the thicker stock though
8. 1958 --clean but somewhat uninspired design
9. 1959 --design is too busy, not enough space devoted to photos