Thread: 1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-23-2007, 07:19 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default 1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Frank Evanov

In terms of acquiring cards Jack, the 1957 set is screwy. You can't always go by the pops.

For example, the #270 SENATORS TEAM [49] and #346 DICK LITTLEFIELD [49] are equal in population, but the PSA 8 Senators averages $350 per card while a PSA 8 Littlefield sells for $90.

Look at #340 BILL WIGHT [49]...easily had for $150, while #139 LOU KRETLOW [46] will run you $400!

There are over 30 active sets on the 1957 Topps baseball PSA Registry with high completion rates/grades. Plus I know of a number of high grade PSA sets not on the Registry. Getting a card for this set in many cases is more influenced by who needs it, rather than its pop.

Frank

Reply With Quote