Thread: 1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-23-2007, 11:29 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default 1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: jackgoodman

Thanks Jim and Bob.

Why did you use 58% of the average number to determine a "low pop" number?

Would the same method (number of cards graded divided by number of cards in set) times 58% work for PSA 7's too?

Would this calculation work for any post-war (1950s/1960s) set to determine the "low pop" numbers in high grade (7 - 10)?.

This is really educational - thanks in advance for your continued input.

Reply With Quote