Posted By:
Frank WakefieldThank you, B Marlowe. And WELCOME!!!
I think Amber has sold this, long ago. So this won't affect her.
And all along I maintained that the photo was of Ed Reulbach, that it was a pitcher's motion.
I was confident of that before you posted, although everyone else who bothered to post wouldn't hear of it. I don't think the photo was replaced, I don't think it is Tinker, I think the manufacturer just got the wrong photo on there, Reulbach's photo.
I think it would be about a 10% detraction on the sale value, IF the buyer figured out that it wasn't Tinker.
Now I hope Dan Bretta reads your post and rethinks what he posted 5 months ago. Dan must be a good guy, or trustworthy Leon would not have plugged him in with moderator powers; still Dan seems to always disagree with whatever I post. Maybe he can rethink one time.