[Archive]

Posted By: Frank Wakefield

If I've been emailing Scott Brockelman back and forth about a ball card transaction, I can see that he or I should be upset if some third party intervenes and communicates to some 4th party who offers more money, buys the card, and leaves Scott or me shut out.

But once information is up on the internet, it's kinda up there for the public to see... I understand how outing annoys some, and if it is done to thwart a certain buyer then it is done maliciously. But outing so others might see? That seems to me a fair, reasonable action.

Woolfie, the day that I buy an outed lot only because I bid on it after it was outed, and you thereby lost... that's the day to whine.